Update on LED corrections

1.

Sector dependent shower shapes sorted into different preshower bins - Triple Gaussian Fits (Version 2)

 Transverse Shower Profile Distributions 

 

Run 9 200GeV Dijet Stats & QA: Test 2

I have rerun my QA, kinematic, false asymmetry, and dijet ALL statistics analysis originally seen

  • pagebs's blog
  • Read more
  • run 7 : K0s inv mass signal-to-noise and significance vs. St cut

    The idea is to look at the cut St = dca /σ (track significance) but for all possibilities (silicon hits = 0 to silicon hits =4)

    Acceptance Effects

     

    For flat distribution Input A =0.03 = Output A=0.0299584 %diff =0.138696

    For PhiC = 0 or 180 Input A =0.03 = Output A=0 %diff =100

    Windows 7 (Vista) ReadyBoost, Prefetch and Superfetch

    On spare times, I started to look into Windows 7 (Vista) new features on using caching on faster storage device (ReadyBoost) and also tried to understand what Prefetch and Superfetch does.

    Bug in TPCEGEO2

    There is a bug in tpcegeo2.g.  The bug results in two holes in the TPC FEE cards being placed at an incorrect location.  This bug should have negligible impact on any existing s

    GMT: TPC Calibrations

     Prepared for meeting with STAR Upgrades leader (F. Videbaek) regarding GMT installation.

    -Gene

     

    HFT : pointing resolution with a toy model

     Pointing resolution is defined by :

    where the second term is :

    Summary of tracking testers

    Dataset samples requested by PWG and tester list

    • Spectra: Feng Zhao (UCLA),  Yuhui Zhu (SINAP)

    Varied vertex distribution study of Run 6 simulation

    Since the last look at the simulation set (http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/ncolmena/2011/jul/06/2nd-attempt-run-6-simulation & http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/ncolmena/2011/jun/27/r

    Naming convention for a Collins "moment analysis"

    Notes regarding MLE

    These are somewhat dated, and may include a few mistakes.  But there may be some useful information in them.  First is a general explanation of the math for MLE (maximum likelihood estimation), and the second discusses how to interpret the MLE results.

    AOB

    Speaker : All ( All )


    Talk time : 12:40, Duration : 00:20

    VMC Geometry update

    Speaker : Jason Webb ( BNL )


    Talk time : 12:20, Duration : 00:20

    HIT-by-HIT comparison between AgML and AgSTAR geometries for tag y2009c

    Calibration status for Run11

    Speaker : Grant Webb ( UKY )


    Talk time : 12:00, Duration : 00:20

    Software and Computing Meeting

    2011-07-20 12:00
    2011-07-20 13:00
    America/New York
    Wednesday, 20 July 2011
    1-189, EVO, at 16:00 (GMT), duration : 01:00
    TimeTalkPresenter
    12:00Calibration status for Run11 ( 00:20 ) 2 filesGrant Webb (UKY)
    12:20VMC Geometry update ( 00:20 ) 0 filesJason Webb (BNL)
    12:40AOB ( 00:20 ) 0 filesAll (All)

    Paper


    Talk time : 15:20, Duration : 00:20

    Simulation update

    Speaker : Wlodek


    Talk time : 15:00, Duration : 00:20

    Analysis progress

    Speaker : Donika, Ivan


    Talk time : 14:40, Duration : 00:20