Would you support rewarding institutions and advisers who support service work?

Strongly support
12% (3 votes)
Support
52% (13 votes)
Neutral
24% (6 votes)
Oppose
8% (2 votes)
Strongly oppose
4% (1 vote)
Total votes: 25

Would you support giving an award for the best service work project in a given year?

Strongly support
28% (7 votes)
Support
40% (10 votes)
Neutral
12% (3 votes)
Oppose
12% (3 votes)
Strongly oppose
8% (2 votes)
Total votes: 25

Would you be in favor of uniform requirements for service work (all students perform service work for N months)?

Strongly support
4% (1 vote)
Support
52% (13 votes)
Neutral
20% (5 votes)
Oppose
20% (5 votes)
Strongly oppose
4% (1 vote)
Total votes: 25

Are you at all concerned that service is un-evenly divided (some junior do service, others do not)?

Very concerned
8% (2 votes)
Moderately concerned
50% (13 votes)
Not concerned
42% (11 votes)
No opinion
0% (0 votes)
Total votes: 26

Do you think service work is taken into account when determining who gets a talk

Very much so
8% (2 votes)
Somewhat
19% (5 votes)
Neutral/no opinion
19% (5 votes)
Not often
35% (9 votes)
Not at all
19% (5 votes)
Total votes: 26

Do you think the requirement for service work in STAR is ____ months

0 to 3
16% (4 votes)
3 to 6
36% (9 votes)
6 to 9
20% (5 votes)
9 to 12
28% (7 votes)
More than 12
0% (0 votes)
Total votes: 25

I have spent ___ months full time (40 hours per week basis) doing service work

0 to 3
20% (5 votes)
3 to 6
44% (11 votes)
6 to 9
20% (5 votes)
9 to 12
8% (2 votes)
More than 12
8% (2 votes)
Total votes: 25

Do you think of service work ideally as something you do for the collaboration's benefit or your own?

Mostly my benefit
0% (0 votes)
Both but more my benefit
17% (4 votes)
Equally my benefit and the collaboration's
50% (12 votes)
Both but more the collaboration's benefit
21% (5 votes)
Mostly the collaboration's benefit
13% (3 votes)
No opinions
0% (0 votes)
Total votes: 24

02) relative BSMD-E gains from 1M dAu events

Under:

 Glimpse of relative calibration of BSMDE from 2008 d+Au data

 

Input: 1M dAu minb events from runs: 8335112+8336019

junior's talk

 .

Optimization of cluter size for gamma ID in the endcap

Abstract:  We compare four different cluster sizes (3x3, 2x2, 2x1 and Ahmed's high-tower/2x1 scheme) in the endcap.  Monte Carlo simulation indicates that Ahmed's scheme provides the be

IST R&D status

Speaker : Gerrit J. van Nieuwenhuizen ( MIT )


Talk time : 00:00, Duration : 00:10

Local Polarimetry using the ZDC SMD

 Analysis of ZDC SMD data shows that it may be used as a local polarimeter is presented in the attached report.

STAR Talks Committee Recommendations

Under:

See the STAR Talks Mailing list and STAR Presentations Link on

the Homepage for  up to date information.

 

2008.07.07 Pre-shower1 < 5MeV cut study

Ilya Selyuzhenkov July 07, 2008

Data sets:

20080708_pp06l2gNoPre1cuts_ZOOM_counts_peakEnergyPre1_pt1gt7pt2gt5_noPi0Cuts_dist_pre1only_log

20080708_pp06l2gNoPre1cuts_ZOOM_counts_peakEnergyPre1_pt1gt7pt2gt5_noPi0Cuts_dist_pre1only_log

20080708_pp06l2gNoPre1cuts__counts_peakEnergyPre1_pt1gt7pt2gt5_noPi0Cuts_dist_pre1only_log

20080708_pp06l2gNoPre1cuts__counts_peakEnergyPre1_pt1gt7pt2gt5_noPi0Cuts_dist_pre1only_log

20080707_pp06l2gPre1lt5MeV_showerShapes_meanE_vStrip_pt1gt7pt2gt5_noPi0Cuts_scalePeak_logy

20080707_pp06l2gPre1lt5MeV_showerShapes_meanE_vStrip_pt1gt7pt2gt5_noPi0Cuts_scalePeak_logy

20080707_pp06l2gPre1lt5MeV_dir_fitPeakUV_deltaMaxFitResidualUV

20080707_pp06l2gPre1lt5MeV_dir_fitPeakUV_deltaMaxFitResidualUV

20080707_pp06l2g__counts_ptGamma_noPt1CutnoPt2Cut_noPi0Cuts_dist_pre1only_log

20080707_pp06l2g__counts_ptGamma_noPt1CutnoPt2Cut_noPi0Cuts_dist_pre1only_log