- Hard Probes
- Heavy Flavor
- Jet-like correlations
- Other Groups
- Peripheral Collisions
- Spin
- Spin PWG
- Spin/Cold-QCD Older Physics Analysis
- 2006 EEMC Neutral Pion Cross Section and A_LL
- 2006 Gamma + Jet
- 2009 Lambda D_LL @ 200 GeV
- 2009 dijet x-sect/A_LL @ 200 GeV
- 2011 FMS Jet-like correlations @ 500 GeV
- 2011 FMS inclusive pions @ 500 GeV
- 2012 EEMC Neutral Pion A_LL
- 2012 Jet A_LL @ 500 GeV
- 2012 Lambda D_TT @200GeV
- 2012 Pi0 - Jet A_LL @ 500
- 2012 Pions in Jets A_UT @ 200 GeV
- 2012 dijet A_LL @ 500
- 2012/13 FMS A_LL @ 500 GeV
- 2013 Di-jet A_LL @ 500 GeV
- A New Users Guide to PDSF Success
- Analyses from the early years
- Beam Polarizations
- Charged Pions
- Fully Reconstructed Ws
- Jet Trees
- W 2009 analysis , pp 500 GeV
- W 2011 AL
- Useful Links
- Working Group Members
Background from PID Contamination
Updated on Thu, 2007-10-18 08:19. Originally created by kocolosk on 2006-09-06 17:50.
Summary:
Points to remember:
4 < pt < 6:
6 < pt < 8:
8 < pt < 10:
A_LL for protons and kaons
The goal of this analysis is to estimate the contribution to A_LL from particles that aren't charged pions but nevertheless make it into my analysis sample. So far I have calculated A_LL using a different dE/dx window that should pick out mostly protons and kaons, and I've estimated the fraction of particles inside my dE/dx window that are not pions by using a multi-Gaussian fit in each pt bin. I've assumed that this fraction is not spin-dependent.
Points to remember:
- my analysis cuts on -1 < nSigmaPion < 2
pi- is on the left, pi+ on the right. Each row is a pt bin corresponding to the binning of my asymmetry measurement. The red Gaussian corresponds to pions, green is protons and kaons, blue is electrons. So far I've let all nine parameters float. I tried fixing the mean and width of the pion Gaussian at 0. and 1., respectively, but that made for a worse overall fit. So far, the fit results for the first two bins seem OK.
2 < pt < 4:







I extracted the the integral of each curve from -1..2 and got the following fractional contributions to the total integral in this band:
pi- bin | pion | p/K | electron |
2-4 | 0.91 | 0.09 | 0.01 |
4-6 | 0.92 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
6-8 | 0.78 | 0.07 | 0.15 |
8-10 | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.01 |
pi+ bin | pion | p/K | electron |
2-4 | 0.90 | 0.09 | 0.01 |
4-6 | 0.91 | 0.06 | 0.03 |
6-8 | 0.68 | 0.06 | 0.26 |
8-10 | 0.88 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
I repeated my A_LL analysis changing the dE/dx window to [-inf,-1] to select a good sample of protons and kaons. The A_LL I calculate for a combined MB || JP1 || JP2 trigger (ignore the theory curves) is


For comparison, the A_LL result for the pion sample looks like


I know it looks like I must have the p/K plots switched, but I rechecked my work and everything was done correctly. Anyway, since p/K is the dominant background the next step is to use this as the A_LL for the background and use the final contamination estimates from the fits to get a systematic on the pion measurement
»
- kocolosk's blog
- Printer-friendly version
- Login or register to post comments