SSD data after online pedestal subtraction (20140516)
run : st_sst_15136011_raw_1000014.daq
# of events : 1000
Online ped. & zero subtraction :
Fig1 : number of strips for the cumulated P-ladders and N-ladders vs. event #

We see that :
Fig 2 : number of strips for the cumulated P-ladders and N-ladders vs. event # (break-down per ladder)

comments :
Fig 3 : number of strips for the cumulated P-ladders and N-ladders (break-down per ladder)

II) look at the offline reco
# of events : 1000
Online ped. & zero subtraction :
sideP : uped = (UInt_t)(ped + NSIGMA*rms + 0.5); uped = (uped - OFFSET + CONSTANT )&MASK; side N: uped = (UInt_t)(ped - NSIGMA*rms + 0.5); uped = (uped - OFFSET - CONSTANT )&MASK; with :UInt_t MASK = 1023; UInt_t THRESHOLD = 700; UInt_t OFFSET = 375; UInt_t NSIGMA = 4; UInt_t CONSTANT = 3;
Fig1 : number of strips for the cumulated P-ladders and N-ladders vs. event #

We see that :
- the numbers of strips/event is constant vs. event #
- there are some hot ladders on both side
- the numbers of strips on P-side > number of strips on N-side : this may be due to the the fact that strips on N-side have a higher noise so the threshold NSIGMA*rms (where NSIGMA = 4) kills a lot of strips
Fig 2 : number of strips for the cumulated P-ladders and N-ladders vs. event # (break-down per ladder)


comments :
- for both P and N-ladders, only few ladders have a really high number of strips per event
- removing these ladders gives <# strips P-side> ~ 500 , <# strips N-side> ~ 100
Fig 3 : number of strips for the cumulated P-ladders and N-ladders (break-down per ladder)


II) look at the offline reco
- plots for strips, clusters and points reconstructed with the offline code : here
- zip file with 20 pdf files for the charge matching plots : here
Groups:
- bouchet's blog
- Login or register to post comments